There is a great deal of furor going on about the proposed building of an Islamic community center and mosque a short distance away from the World Trade Center site in New York City. On Friday, President Obama made a public statement about the issue, pointing our that “This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country, and will not be treated differently by their government, is essential to who we are.”
Republicans jumped right on him, accusing the President of “pandering to radical Islam” and saying he “caved in to political correctness.”
I’d like to ask the Republican leaders a simple question: When did you stop supporting the Bill of Rights?
In case there’s any confusion out there, or Americans who didn’t get civics lessons because their teachers were busy ensuring no child got left behind, let’s quickly review what the Bill of Rights is. Namely, the Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, and came into effect in December 1791. They include such “golden oldies” as the First Amendment:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The Bill of Rights is about our civil liberties. It is about our freedom, the freedom for which men and women in uniform are fighting and dying. Protecting our civil liberties is not “pandering to radical Islam” or “caving into political correctness.” Denying our civil liberties plays into the hands of terrorists, letting those who would undermine American values, win.
Conservatives go on and on about the importance of upholding the Constitution. Their claim is that President Obama has been “trampling” the Constitution throughout his first 20 months in office. But suddenly, when he explicitly upholds the Constitutional rights of Muslims to build a place of worship on private land, these “staunch defenders” of the Constitution are nowhere to be seen.
Let’s give credit to Flordia Governor Charlie Crist, the former Republican now running as an independent candidate for senator, who supported Obama’s statement. Let’s give even more credit to New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg who actually led the way making a powerful speech in favor of religious freedom on August 3rd. The video of this 7-minute speech is here. Here’s the bit that I thought was most important:
“Whatever you may think of the proposed mosque and community center, lost in the heat of the debate has been a basic question: should government attempt to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on private property, based on their particular religion?”
As we head into the midterm elections in November, before you make a decision about who deserves your vote, I’d ask that you take the time to ask the candidates whether or not they support the Bill of Rights. Use this case of the New York City mosque as a litmus test, because there really is only one way to support the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution. That’s to answer “no” to Mayor Bloomberg’s question: the government should not attempt to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on private property, based on their particular religion.
@jandsschultz – The problem is, the mosque isn’t at Ground Zero. It is two blocks away from one edge of the entire World Trade Center complex, on the site of an former Burlington Coat Factory store. The neighborhood is largely shuttered businesses and unused buildings. There’s nothing disrespectful about the location because the community center isn’t being built on the new WTC complex or even across the street and within sight of it. The comparison to Auschwitz doesn’t hold up.@ElusiveWords – Yes, Matt, it seems that people have a lot of strong feelings, often unsuported by facts. As for what the space is proposed to be, it isn’t actually a mosque, if you want to be technical. It is a community center that will include a prayer space along with everything else. Mosques are, to my understanding, used only as a place of worship. The airport here in Bangkok has several Muslim prayer spaces in it. That does not make it a mosque. =)
@LoBornlytesThoughtPalace – Wrong troll. It is a slap in the face to all those who died to uphold the Constitution of the USA. BTW you have no clue.
Thanks for setting me straight. Not being familiar with that area I was unaware that the proposed mosque site was several blocks away. I still think Krughhammer’s comments were legitimate, but not as applicable to this particular issue as I thought.